Legal blog

The Online Platform Dispute Resolution Board Has Commenced Its Operations

2025-11-18 | IT Law

The Online Platform Dispute Resolution Board Has Commenced Its Operations

What Is the OPVT?

The European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) entered into force in November 2022, establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework for the operation of online platforms within the EU. Its aim is to enhance transparency, ensure effective consumer protection, and strengthen action against illegal content.

The DSA allows Member States to establish alternative dispute resolution bodies enabling users to challenge decisions taken by online platforms—such as account suspensions, content removals or failures to remove harmful content—in a simple and accessible way. The full text of the DSA in Hungarian is available at the link provided in the original article.

In Hungary, the Online Platform Dispute Resolution Board (OPVT) has been designated as the body authorised to conduct such out-of-court dispute resolution. Responsibility for the implementation of the DSA in each Member State lies with the respective Digital Services Coordinator; in Hungary, this role is fulfilled by the National Media and Infocommunications Authority (NMHH), which is responsible for appointing and certifying the members of the OPVT. More detailed information about the OPVT is available on its official website.


How Does the OPVT Procedure Work?

Applications may be submitted in writing, either by post or electronically (via e-mail).
The Board examines the application and, if it does not meet legal requirements, it will request the applicant to remedy the deficiencies. If the application or the supplementary submission is compliant, the Board will primarily seek to facilitate an agreement between the parties.

If no settlement is reached, the Board may issue one of the following decisions after assessing the facts and evidence:

  1. Rejection of the application if it is unfounded;

  2. A binding decision containing an obligation, if the application is well-founded and the online platform operator concerned has previously submitted to the Board’s jurisdiction;

  3. A recommendation, if the application is well-founded but the online platform operator has not previously submitted to the Board’s jurisdiction.

The procedural fee payable by the applicant is HUF 3,000.
The procedure does not generally require personal attendance, although a personal hearing may be requested.


If you are involved in a dispute with an online platform provider, or if you require legal assistance in any matter related to information technology, please feel free to contact our expert colleagues. Our law firm regularly represents clients in both dispute resolution and claims management procedures.

Know Your Agent – Who Is Liable When AI Acts on Our Behalf?

2026-09-10
Know Your Agent – Who Is Liable When AI Acts on Our Behalf?

The next stage in the development of AI is no longer simply about artificial intelligence answering questions or making recommendations. So-called AI agents are increasingly capable of acting autonomously on behalf of users: initiating purchases, booking appointments, carrying out financial transactions, or even managing processes across multiple digital systems.

This, however, raises a new question, primarily of a legal nature: how can it be determined whether an AI agent was actually authorised to perform a particular action, and who is liable if it exceeds the limits of its authority?

Read more

Act XXXVIII of 2026 on the Repeal of Certain Statutory Provisions Concerning Crypto-Asset Conversion Services

2026-08-07
Act XXXVIII of 2026 on the Repeal of Certain Statutory Provisions Concerning Crypto-Asset Conversion Services

The market of digital finance and crypto-assets is continuously developing, to which domestic legislation must also dynamically adapt. Act XXXVIII of 2026 on the Repeal of Certain Statutory Provisions Concerning Crypto-Asset Conversion Services, entering into force on 7 August 2026, constitutes a significant milestone in this doctrinal field.

The focus of the legislation is the phasing out of the previously introduced validation obligation, as well as the termination of the related criminal law and administrative authority proceedings, the purpose of which is to establish uniform regulation and to create the conditions for customers to use services in a safe and transparent manner.

Read more

Changes to the Rules on the Authorisation of Crypto-Asset Service Providers in Hungary

2026-08-06
Changes to the  Rules on the Authorisation of Crypto-Asset Service Providers in Hungary

On 2 August 2026, Decree No. 7/2026 (VII. 30.) of the Supervisory Authority for Regulatory Affairs (SZTFH)entered into force. The Decree lays down the detailed rules governing the authorisation and registration of crypto-asset service providers engaged in crypto-asset exchange validation activities. At the same time, it repeals the previously applicable SZTFH Decrees No. 10/2025 (VI. 26.) and No. 12/2025 (VI. 26.), which regulated the same subject matter.

The primary objective of the new Decree is to align the Hungarian regulatory framework with the European Union's legal framework governing crypto-assets while ensuring a more coherent and transparent system for the authorisation and supervision of service providers operating in this sector.

Read more